I am going to have to stop claiming that I hate winter running. Because, not only have I been (thoroughly) enjoying it, the conditions encountered on 15 February 2012 gave me one of my favourite runs to date. It was icy, it was muddy, it was slipping uphill and sliding downhill, it was spectacular. And, I came away wanting more. A winter running monster may be in the making.
As has been the case thus far, I headed out with a different type of shoe than I had used on previous outings. All two of them (this year). This time, I went with my trusty trail trainers. When in doubt, when I am not (quite) sure whether I will be taking a paved or unpaved route, I throw on trail shoes. Even though I require as much padding as possible, when it comes down to padding or grip, I will (always) choose grip. Why? Because, all the padding in the universe won’t help you should you loose your footing and a pull or twist ensues. When in doubt, go with grip. Well, that’s my take (at least). And, I think it is quite clear that I am not an expert in anything and should never be trusted for any information or advice regarding any matter known to man. A claim evidenced by my constant knack for choosing the wrong shoes. If I go with street, I will end up off trail or on ice. If I go with fell, I will end up encountering minimal ice. If I go with trail, I will end up slipping and sliding on icy, muddy, messy hillside trails. Which is exactly what happened. Not that I regret opting to venture out on this side trail. And, the shoes worked just fine. But, if ever there was a need for my fell running shoes on my local trails, I do believe I found it.
My run started out as it usually does. I opted for the unpaved route, rather than the paved route, knowing that the paved route would (still) have extensive stretches of ice. And, even though I am getting into this winter running thing, I would (still) rather avoid those long stretches of repeatedly melted and refrozen ice. They’re just nasty. I’ll take the unpredictable mix of terrain, thank you very much. So, the first 2.5ish miles were business as usual. There was even less ice than the last time I had gone out. Plus, my confidence was building up. So, there’s nothing interesting to report. Not that there ever is. So, that should say a lot about how uneventful it was. But, then, as I was on a paved segment, approaching a turn-off to a narrow, unpaved side trail, my squeaky hamster wheel started turning. Paved-unpaved-paved-unpaved… That unpaved trail has a decently steep start. And, it looks quite snowy. I ventured up a few meters and looked around. I headed back down to the pavement. I shot some photos. I was balking. With trained reasoning.
See, when the park added these side trails, they had mountain bikes in mind. Although they are open to runners, there seems to be this mindset out there that running is for roads and paved trails. This is made quite clear when one tries shopping for trail shoes. Although I have had luck with Adidas and New Balance, and remain (pretty) loyal to Nike, the options are very limited. If they are making them (at the time you need them) at all. Sadly, the best bet will (always) be outdoor specialty (pricier) brands, such as Salomon. Because, there is this ridiculous idea engrained in the mass public that runners are all suburbanites, waving to neighbors as they show off how fit they are. Well, I run. And, I prefer to run on deliciously unpredictable dirt, kicking up rocks, tripping over roots, and jumping over fallen branches. But, because I appear to be in the minority, all the promising unpaved trails in my area are designed for mountain biking, so narrow that any encounter would result in someone getting angry, if not hurt. Being passive and non-confrontational, I try to just stay off these routes. So, even though it was the middle of the day on a weekday, and even though this trail I was staring up at looked as if it would be unappealing to most cyclists at this time, I hesitated. Then, I went for it. And, it was (about) four miles of evidence as to why I love trail running.
The route started with a snowy, uphill hike of a run, taking me through some woods, around sharp bends, alongside steep drops, up, up and away. Until I reached a plateau from which I could see the trail rolling out, up again, and disappearing back into another forest. It was picture perfect. The portrait of what a trail run should be. Although there was a little bit of me, wondering where this was going to lead and how long it was going to take, I couldn’t resist finding out. And, where it led was more twisting hillside stretches, complete with ramp-like bumps so massive that I couldn’t help but wonder how nuts one would have to be to take a bike over them. Which was followed by the urge to get back on a bike and try it as soon as possible (an unwise thought, as I haven’t been on a bicycle in years). In my last post, I presented parallels between icy trail runs and Rally Sweden. Well, one of these bumps (which concealed the trail beyond it-which turned out to be a sharp turn) was a Colin’s Crest. So steep, such a drop, and covered in ice. It was very exciting to just try to run over it without falling on my face. And, it only got better from there, as the trail would start to wind downhill, with shaded forest sections of pure snow and ice, complete with steep drops, zero room for misstep, and a high risk for Latvala-ing the descent. This was everything I never knew I so very much wanted, so very much needed. As the snow and ice turned into (equally slippery) mud and worked its way back to where the loop began, and as snow started falling upon rejoining my standard eight-mile route (recall that the side trail was about four miles, for a grand total of 12 miles), I couldn’t help but feel a little pissed off that runners are discouraged from entering these trails. Sure, they are open to runners. But, when they are built with just enough room for bikes to pass through in single-file fashion, it is more than a bit unwelcoming. Even I am a hard sell on the prospect of being run over by an energy drink-fuelled douche on a mountain bike.
Not that all mountain bikers are energy drink-fuelled douches. They aren’t. I know a lot of very cautious, very courteous cyclists who are tired of these bad eggs, ruining their reputations. But, those bad eggs are the ones most likely to mow down a runner. And, just to be fair, I am very aware that there is a hideous percentage of self-centred trail-hog runners out there, making life miserable for good cyclists. But, the fact remains that these trails aren’t catering to a mix and that runners are the losing party.
Sad as it is that my time on this amazing route is limited, I am so beyond glad that I decided to venture out on it. Because, it not only made my day, it reminded me that there is a reason why I get so bored and demotivated by runs on pavement. I (really) love the challenge of a good, nasty, unpaved trail. Plus, exploring this trail fuelled my urge to get back on a bike. Something I was aware I needed to do (anyway). But, was looking at in terms of it being an unfortunate situation, brought on by a need to take some pressure of my body, rather than an adventure to be had. Now, I can see that there will be whole new ways for me to hurt myself. Ways I haven’t explored since I was a kid, racing down hills, no-hands, crashing into swamps and all. And, if that doesn’t pan out, I can (always) let my newfound side trail cravings override any concerns over being run down by a cyclist. Either way, there may be some potential for all sorts of trouble on the horizon, after all. Until then, bring on more of that winter running!



see more photographic evidence of my misadventures [here]
Like this:
One blogger likes this post.